CIPAA 2012 : CIPAA Claims Against A Sole Proprietor – Hongler Enterprise Sdn Bhd v Chai Hon Sang (trading as Hock Seng Trading & Construction) [WA-24C-130-08/2023]

View PDF 23rd October 2024 ISSUES There is no prohibition to initiate adjudication proceedings against a sole proprietor under the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (“CIPAA 2012”). Sole…

Continue ReadingCIPAA 2012 : CIPAA Claims Against A Sole Proprietor – Hongler Enterprise Sdn Bhd v Chai Hon Sang (trading as Hock Seng Trading & Construction) [WA-24C-130-08/2023]

CIPAA 2012 : Can a Stay be Granted after an Adjudication Decision is enforced?
Econpile (M) Sdn Bhd v ASM Development (KL) Sdn Bhd & Anor Case [2024] 5 CLJ 16

View PDF 22nd May 2024 ISSUES It is not uncommon for the losing party to file an application to set aside an adjudication decision and/or apply for it to be…

Continue ReadingCIPAA 2012 : Can a Stay be Granted after an Adjudication Decision is enforced?
Econpile (M) Sdn Bhd v ASM Development (KL) Sdn Bhd & Anor Case [2024] 5 CLJ 16

CIPAA 2012 : Money Due Or Payable – The Over-Arching Pre-Condition for Direct Payment From Principal? JDI Builtech (M) Sdn Bhd v Danga Jed Development Malaysia Sdn Bhd [J-02(C)(A)-1066-06/2022]

View PDF 24th April 2024ISSUESTo trigger direct payment under section 30 of the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (“CIPAA 2012”), the successful Claimant will have to serve a…

Continue ReadingCIPAA 2012 : Money Due Or Payable – The Over-Arching Pre-Condition for Direct Payment From Principal? JDI Builtech (M) Sdn Bhd v Danga Jed Development Malaysia Sdn Bhd [J-02(C)(A)-1066-06/2022]

CIPAA 2012 : Limitation to an Adjudicator’s Jurisdiction

Anas Construction Sdn Bhd v JKP Sdn Bhd & Another Appeal [02(F)-3-01/2023(P)/ 02(F)-4-01/2023(P)]

View PDF 27th March 2024ISSUESIf an Adjudicator made a decision based on contract provision not cited or relied upon by the Appellant in the Payment Claim or Adjudication Claim, would…

Continue Reading

CIPAA 2012 : Limitation to an Adjudicator’s Jurisdiction

Anas Construction Sdn Bhd v JKP Sdn Bhd & Another Appeal [02(F)-3-01/2023(P)/ 02(F)-4-01/2023(P)]

CIPAA 2012 : Direct Payment from Principal and Judicial Management Order

Concrete Empire Sdn Bhd v Turnpike Synergy Sdn Bhd

[WA-24C-116-06/2022]

View PDF 22nd November 2023ISSUESWhen the losing respondent does not make payment for the Adjudicated Sum under the Adjudication Decision to the claimant, the claimant may request for direct payment from…

Continue Reading

CIPAA 2012 : Direct Payment from Principal and Judicial Management Order

Concrete Empire Sdn Bhd v Turnpike Synergy Sdn Bhd

[WA-24C-116-06/2022]

On Demand Performance Guarantee: Unconscionability and Breach of the Underlying Principle Contract

Oxley Rising Sdn. Bhd. v Ssyangyong Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd. And Anor Appeal

[W-02(C)(A)-274-02/2022 & W-02(IM)(C)-273-02/2022]

View PDF 31st October 2023ISSUESIt is a commonplace in the construction industry for the employer to require the contractor to provide a performance guarantee in the form of a bank…

Continue Reading

On Demand Performance Guarantee: Unconscionability and Breach of the Underlying Principle Contract

Oxley Rising Sdn. Bhd. v Ssyangyong Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd. And Anor Appeal

[W-02(C)(A)-274-02/2022 & W-02(IM)(C)-273-02/2022]

CIPAA 2012 : “Adjudicated Amount” under Section 30 – Interest and Costs, Included or Otherwise?

Pali PTP Sdn Bhd v Bond M&E Sdn Bhd & Another Appeal

[W-02(C)(A)-314-02/2021 / W-02(C)(A)-399-02/2021]

View PDF 27th September 2023 ISSUES Where a Principal is ordered to make payment of the “adjudicated amount” pursuant to Section 30 of Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012…

Continue Reading

CIPAA 2012 : “Adjudicated Amount” under Section 30 – Interest and Costs, Included or Otherwise?

Pali PTP Sdn Bhd v Bond M&E Sdn Bhd & Another Appeal

[W-02(C)(A)-314-02/2021 / W-02(C)(A)-399-02/2021]

CIPAA 2012 : Forbearance, Estoppel and Ouster by Contract

Chua Heng Hong & Ors v S Lite Electrical and Engineering Sdn Bhd & Anor [2023] 1 LNS 335

View PDF 30th August 2023ISSUESIf a party has agreed to forbear payment for construction work, can such forbearance be a basis to apply to the Court to stop the said…

Continue Reading

CIPAA 2012 : Forbearance, Estoppel and Ouster by Contract

Chua Heng Hong & Ors v S Lite Electrical and Engineering Sdn Bhd & Anor [2023] 1 LNS 335

CIPAA 2012 : Setting Aside – Res Judicata & Excess of Jurisdiction. Can a new Adjudication be initiated and decided based on the same Adjudication papers?

Meridian Contracts Sdn Bhd v Bauer (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd
[WA-24C-137-07/2022]

View PDF 28th June 2023ISSUESIt is not uncommon for a claimant to initiate more than one adjudication under the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (“CIPAA 2012”) in the…

Continue ReadingCIPAA 2012 : Setting Aside – Res Judicata & Excess of Jurisdiction. Can a new Adjudication be initiated and decided based on the same Adjudication papers?

Meridian Contracts Sdn Bhd v Bauer (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd
[WA-24C-137-07/2022]

Liquidated Ascertained Damages : Can a Main Contractor impose LAD on a Nominated Subcontractor when the Employer did not impose any LAD?

Pantas Alam Sdn Bhd v Hau Wah Letrik Sdn Bhd [PA-22NCvC-18-01/2022]

View PDF 31st May 2023 ISSUES Often in a chain of construction contracts, when there is delay to the nominated subcontractor’s works, the delay may translate to a delay in…

Continue ReadingLiquidated Ascertained Damages : Can a Main Contractor impose LAD on a Nominated Subcontractor when the Employer did not impose any LAD?

Pantas Alam Sdn Bhd v Hau Wah Letrik Sdn Bhd [PA-22NCvC-18-01/2022]

CIPAA 2012 : Exceptional Circumstances for Conditional Stay of Adjudication Decision pending Litigation / Arbitration
Mudajaya Corporation Bhd v KWSL Builders Sdn Bhd and Anor Case [BA-24C-52-08/2022 & BA-24C-56-08/2022]

View PDF 19th April 2023IssuesThe Federal Court in the case of View Esteem Sdn Bhd v Bina Puri Holdings Bhd [2019] 5 CLJ 479 (“View Esteem”) held that a stay…

Continue ReadingCIPAA 2012 : Exceptional Circumstances for Conditional Stay of Adjudication Decision pending Litigation / Arbitration
Mudajaya Corporation Bhd v KWSL Builders Sdn Bhd and Anor Case [BA-24C-52-08/2022 & BA-24C-56-08/2022]

Stay Pending Arbitration : Limitation stops when action commences in Civil Courts
SH Builder & Marketing Sdn Bhd v Bongsor Bina Sdn Bhd [2022] 1 LNS 2839

View PDF 29th March 2023 Issues When an action filed into court is stayed under Section 10 of the Arbitration Act 2005 for the disputes to be referred to arbitration,…

Continue ReadingStay Pending Arbitration : Limitation stops when action commences in Civil Courts
SH Builder & Marketing Sdn Bhd v Bongsor Bina Sdn Bhd [2022] 1 LNS 2839

Loss & Expense : “Within” and “Beyond” Reasonable Contemplation
Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia & Kerajaan Malaysia v Sunissa Sdn Bhd [2022] 1 LNS 1119 [Court of Appeal]

View PDF 30th December 2022 Previously, the High Court in Sunissa Sdn Bhd v Kerajaan Malaysia & Anor [2020] MLJU 283 (see our update here) decided, amongst others, that Clause…

Continue ReadingLoss & Expense : “Within” and “Beyond” Reasonable Contemplation
Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia & Kerajaan Malaysia v Sunissa Sdn Bhd [2022] 1 LNS 1119 [Court of Appeal]

CIPAA 2012: Direct Payment from Principal and the Retrospective Effect of Ireka and Jack-in-Pile cases
IT Max Engineering Sdn Bhd v Propel Synergy Sdn Bhd [2021] 1 LNS 105

View PDF 12th May 2021 Issues In Ireka Engineering & Construction Sdn Bhd v. PWC Corporation Sdn Bhd [2020] 1 CLJ 193 and Jack-in Pile (M) Sdn Bhd v. Bauer…

Continue ReadingCIPAA 2012: Direct Payment from Principal and the Retrospective Effect of Ireka and Jack-in-Pile cases
IT Max Engineering Sdn Bhd v Propel Synergy Sdn Bhd [2021] 1 LNS 105

CIPAA 2012 : Early Court Intervention and Definition of “Occupation” under Section 3
Liew Piang Voon v WLT Project Management Sdn bhd [2020] 1 LNS 1105

View PDF 23rd December 2020 Issues Section 3 of the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (“CIPAA 2012”) provides that CIPAA 2012 does not apply to:- “… a construction…

Continue ReadingCIPAA 2012 : Early Court Intervention and Definition of “Occupation” under Section 3
Liew Piang Voon v WLT Project Management Sdn bhd [2020] 1 LNS 1105

CIPAA 2012: Easing Contractors’ Cash Flow – “Pay Now, Argue Later”
Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012

View PDF IntroductionCashflow continuity is of paramount importance to the construction industry. However, contractors are often times faced with issues on payment, or lack thereof, for various reasons. Some contractors…

Continue ReadingCIPAA 2012: Easing Contractors’ Cash Flow – “Pay Now, Argue Later”
Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012

CIPAA Adjudication: Novation Agreement and Adjudication Decision (Computation of time and Corrections)
Encorp Iskandar Development Sdn Bhd v. Konsortium Ipmines Merz Sdn Bhd [2020] 1 LNS 1129

View PDF Issues As the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (“CIPAA 2012”) only have prospective effect, any payment dispute(s) arising from construction contracts execute before the coming into…

Continue ReadingCIPAA Adjudication: Novation Agreement and Adjudication Decision (Computation of time and Corrections)
Encorp Iskandar Development Sdn Bhd v. Konsortium Ipmines Merz Sdn Bhd [2020] 1 LNS 1129

CIPAA 2012 : Supporting Documents in Notice of Adjudication – To Include or Not to Include?
Masterplan Consulting Sdn Bhd v Motorola Solutions Malaysia Sdn Bhd [2020] 1 LNS 219

View PDF 2nd July 2020IssuesSection 8(1) of the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (“CIPAA 2012”) provides that-“A claimant may initiate adjudication proceedings by serving a written notice of…

Continue ReadingCIPAA 2012 : Supporting Documents in Notice of Adjudication – To Include or Not to Include?
Masterplan Consulting Sdn Bhd v Motorola Solutions Malaysia Sdn Bhd [2020] 1 LNS 219

Prior Notice Requirement, Condition Precedent and “Loss and Expense” Claim
Sunissa Sdn Bhd v Kerajaan Malaysia & Anor
[2020] MLJU 283

View PDF 22th May 2020 It is not unusual in the modern standard construction contract to contain a “prior notice requirement clause” as condition precedent before the contractor’s entitlement to…

Continue ReadingPrior Notice Requirement, Condition Precedent and “Loss and Expense” Claim
Sunissa Sdn Bhd v Kerajaan Malaysia & Anor
[2020] MLJU 283

End of content

No more pages to load